Wednesday, March 22, 2023

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

The United States Supreme Court has always been an enigma to me, and this reading (History Channel) and videos (Youtube : Part 1) (Youtube : Part 2) helped clarify some questions I had. I did not know that the nine justices (and the number has not always been nine throughout American history) are appointed for life and there is no retirement age. Most justices serve until they die (Scalia, Bader Ginsburg) and the justice alone determines when they are too old or sick to continue working. There is a cumbersome process to try to impeach and remove a justice who is might be senile (William O. Douglas) but it has not been tried successfully. The Supreme Court also sets its own conflict of interest rules, so an individual justice decides when they have a conflict of interest and should recuse themselves and that is not subject to oversight (not a good thing). The Court also sets its own internal operational rules and the only oversight is that Congress can reduce their budget as a penalty!



Only 115 people have served as justices throughout the (almost) 250-year history of our nation-I was shocked how low that number of justices was. I was aware of the grueling and political confirmation process, where each prospective justice says they have not formed an opinion about hot button issues of the day like abortion or immigration and can be open minded (despite being among the most highly educated persons in the entire country) and yet as soon as they are confirmed they vote the way their supporters knew they would and their opponents seem surprised! The confirmation process has not worked well for the nation for the past thirty years. The fact that the process is so political now has hurt the credibility of the Court and has lowered the public’s level of respect for the Court.

Three interesting things I learned from the history were that the Court had no real power for its first twenty years of existence until Chief Justice John Marshall’s decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803). Secondly, I did not know that the Justices “rode circuit”, meaning that they held court all over the country, until 1891-which would have been a terribly grueling workload when it was horse and buggy. Finally, only William Howard Taft has been both the President of the United States and Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, and that feat is not likely to be repeated!

As an equal third branch of government, the Court’s decisions cannot be overturned by another branch (although the court has, on occasion, changed its own decisions-like on racial segregation or gay marriage). Some of its decisions, like Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Roe v. Wade (1973) have literally changed American life forever by the “stroke of a pen”. Especially in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, only the Supreme Court was free enough from politics to begin the process of desegregation-which came one hundred years too late, but at least it started-in the Supreme Court.


What incredible power-for life-these nine men and women have, to shape the country and our lives for better or worse!

PRIVACY-THE DIGITAL AGE

The six TED videos on our prompt, and others that I watched regarding privacy, make it very clear to me that we are at a dangerous juxtaposition as consumers and citizens in that we have ceded our privacy to the web giants to feed their insatiable desire for ad revenue and also to the government to feed their desire to monitor our every public move-in the interest of our public safety and fighting crime and terrorism. Google and the others will not change their revenue patterns unless they are reigned in by the federal government or some international internet regulatory agency, and our government is currently too preoccupied, ignorant of the workings of the web, and (perhaps) corrupt (at least looking the other way at web privacy abuses) to truly offer any meaningful oversight of privacy collection. 


These videos should scare each of us. It is staggering how much information is being gathered about each of us, how we are assisting the gathering by clicking that we have approved the terms and conditions of web sites–to gather as much information on us, keep it forever, and share it with whatever other websites are interested in purchasing our data.


The government is compiling video of our every public move, and unless local city councils set parameters on how long law enforcement can keep the images, they might be kept for one hundred years. There are civil liberties concerns with so many cameras in public places monitoring our every move. There is a legitimate debate on how much saturation of cameras is necessary to aid law enforcement in keeping the peace and dealing with crime/terrorism and how much is simply for control and to quell free speech.  


Two of the six speakers discussed the possibility that the search engines

might on their own realize that for the good of mankind they should make

their primary goal protecting their customers’ privacy instead of making

maximum revenue for their stockholders. Given the American penchant

for maximum corporate income/greed, that goal of increased privacy

protection instead of profit seems unlikely to be achieved in the short term! 



Juan Enriquez (watch his talk on Youtube) talked about the fact that our social media presence is now for perpetuity (long after our deaths) and that we will always leave a web electronic “tattoo” with large amounts of data that will never go away, so be careful what you put on the web. Finally, there was a video from Darieth Chisolm (watch her talk here on Youtube) with her personal revelation about how she was a victim of cyber stalking and revenge porn and how the internet and law enforcement were impotent to deal with international perpetrators and it took this woman’s perseverance and 13 trips to the courthouse to get adequate protection for herself. Not everyone has that level of determination or her resources. 



The entire block of six videos should leave each of us very afraid of the

information that is gathered about us and very hesitant to post personal

photos and information on social media. The only thing social media giants

fear is truly bad publicity. Like rats, they don’t want to be seen in the light.

It will take exposure by “watchdog groups” or some very bad breaches

of security to cause the public to rise up and demand changes. As long

as we can order from Amazon, Paypal or Starbucks in a few moments,

we will disregard the fact that if we audibly speak the phrase “I need to

buy a new white shirt” near our phones that we will receive emails and

our social media will be full of ads for white shirts for days. These videos

did an excellent job of pointing out the many areas of concern. They offered

some solutions which seemed impractical to me. The videos left me very

uneasy about the future of our web privacy.  


MY TOP FIVE SOURCES OF NEWS AND INFORMATION

The New York Times (nytimes.com) is the best known newspaper in the United States. It has an expansive website covering national and international news. There are dozens of sections of information, such as sports, business, books, health etc. It also has a world renowned group of opinion writers, most of whom write from a liberal and very progressive viewpoint. Along with its rival the Washington Post, it represents the old school “liberal” branch of American news reporting. Even though my father is a conservative, he is a New York Times fiend. He has had a subscription to the New York Times for decades and he will often discuss articles he has read with our family. The site has an average of 552,000,000 visits per month.


The Wall Street Journal (wsj.com) newspaper has been the primary voice for 

the business and conservative communities in the United States for the

past 100 years. It has 78,000,000 average visits per month. It has an extensive

business focus. Its opinion writers have a conservative/pro-business viewpoint.

In the United States, Fox News (foxnews.com) is the primary cable news

network for conservatives, who represent about 30% of the US population.  

Their ability to be the loudest voice for conservatism has allowed the website

to garner 314,000,000 average visits per month.  


ESPN (Entertainment and Sports Programming Network) (espn.com)

is the best known website in the United States for sports articles

and viewing. It is the go-to site for all sports news. Its many TV networks,

which are also covered on the website, allow for virtually every sporting

event in the United States and around the world to be viewed for a fee.

It has 402,000,000 average visits per month.

I check this site several times a day.


NPR (National Public Radio) (npr.org) is the largest network of public radio

stations in the nation, with almost 24/7 news and opinion programming. Its

website mirrors the news reporting that it provides. It has 103,000,000 average

visits per month. It also provides an informative 5 minute news broadcast

which is updated each hour.